This page has moved to a new address.

Reading is good for the brain

Right What You No: Reading is good for the brain

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Reading is good for the brain


I may have mentioned it before, but I am a science nerd. Now that that is out in the open I'd also like to remind you that I'm also a thriller writer with muscles, so sand kickers; you will need to think twice about that.

What I love about science is the way it goes about trying to understand the universe. In fact science even came up with a few studies on how reading is fantastic for you. Psychologists from Washington University used brain scans to see what happens inside our heads when we read stories. They found that ''readers mentally simulate each new situation encountered in a narrative''. The brain weaves these situations together with experiences from its own life to create a mental synthesis. Reading a book leaves us with new neural pathways. Read more here. Nicole Speer, also from Washington University, utilized brain-imaging to look at what happens inside the brains of participants while they read. She discovered that as people read, they are constructing a virtual reality inside their heads every time they read. Read more here.
A reader's brain in action.
I think this is fantastic evidence to wave at people, "See, you should read the book instead of only watching the movie." Rather than readers having this inkling that their brains are running like a well oiled machine, we have actual evidence of this. Without evidence, claims are not worth the air they consume, just ask anyone who has tried to get conspiracy theorists to provide evidence for their claims.

Need more proof? Well how about this article. So not only is reading good, but exploring and interacting with what you are reading is even better. Surfing the net, getting lost in a fictional world.... wait that is the same point twice. Anyway, it leads to even more brain activity.
Surfing the net brain in action.
Now before you all go in search of internet porn to enlarge your brain, I just wanted to air a gripe I have with science reporting in the media: IT SUCKS. Yes, that's right. Reporters are probably the least reliable avenue for the dissemination of science to a wider audience. Scientists themselves often rank just as poorly of course, with their annoying habit of wanting to tell you about the 10 years they have just spent looking down a microscope so that you appreciate how much work went into the facts they are about to impart.

So as part of growing your brain with reading and internet browsing, please spend some time searching for and reading the original scientific papers that are reported. If it wasn't peer reviewed, then it could have been made up, like that rubbish about us only using 10% of our brain.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments:

At January 17, 2012 at 12:16 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for validating us readers. We need all the help we can get. And yes science reporting on TV sucks, but the internet more than makes up for it, I think.

 
At January 17, 2012 at 9:23 PM , Blogger Tyson Adams said...

No problems Rafael. Us readers are in the minority, despite being much smarter and better looking.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home